Practical Considerations
The practical considerations of the using technology in the courtroom cannot be overlooked. We have transitioned into an information technology society in a relatively short period of time, compared to similar transitions to an agricultural and manufacturing economy. There has been and will continue to be change upheavals for the judge, lawyer and trier of fact. Listen and be sensitive to the practical influences upon these parties - it may have a significant impact upon your case. Convincing the Judge
It is imperative that you disclose to the court within a reasonable time before the proceedings of your intention to use technology in the legal proceeding. Many judges have expressed major displeasure with using technology, even the addition of a single extension cord, because it changes the appearance of their courtroom. Obtaining the court’s consent to use technology can be done informally or formally. Many practitioners routinely file “notices” to the court that they wish to use certain technology in the courtroom. Others raise the issue in pretrial conferences. Whether one wishes to bring a single laptop computer or a complete “paperless” presentation system, one must still obtain the consent of the court. Many courts are adopting presentation technology in the courtroom. The driving force behind this adoption is the timesaving economics, and increased juror’s understanding using courtroom technology. Once court administrators and judges realize the cost savings of conducting trials in a paperless environment and the increased understanding of the jury by using technology, implementation in the courtroom should accelerate. In Judge Roger Strand’s federal district court in Phoenix, Arizona (www.uscourts.gov/phoenix/index.html), the practitioner only has to bring to court his factual and legal materials in an electronic format. This Computer Integrated Courtroom (CIC) is completely equipped with computers, CD-ROM’s, and monitors. This enables the practitioner to access and use his case and legal materials and to present his case in a “paperless” format without the need to provide his own equipment. However, since we do not all practice exclusively in Judge Strand’s court, to convince the judge to use technology will partially depend upon the intended use of the technology equipment. The use of the equipment can range from having a laptop or desktop computer to a complete trial presentation system with monitors for the jury, judge, and so on. Some approaches to requesting the court to permit the technology presentation of your case are:
|